Exploring Alternative Models of Economic Growth and Development: A Cross-Comparison
Main Article Content
Abstract
Economic growth is the increase in the production of goods and services in an economy, while economic development refers to the improvement of economic and social welfare in a society. There are various models of economic growth and development, each with its own set of assumptions, variables, and outcomes. The will compare the main features of the following models of economic growth and development: neoclassical growth model, endogenous growth model, human development approach, and post-development model. The neoclassical growth model assumes that technological progress is exogenous and that capital accumulation is the main driver of economic growth. The endogenous growth model, on the other hand, considers the role of human capital and innovation in driving economic growth. The human development approach focuses on the improvement of people's well-being, such as health, education, and quality of life, as the main goal of economic development. The post-development model challenges the mainstream development paradigm and aims to empower communities to create their own development pathways. By comparing these different models of economic growth and development, the aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. This analysis will be useful for policymakers, economists, and researchers who are interested in developing strategies for sustainable and inclusive economic growth and development.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material. However, appropriate credit must be given, a link to the license provided, and any changes indicated. Importantly, the material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
References
Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight talk on trade: Ideas for a sane world economy. Princeton University Press.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. WW Norton & Company.
Sachs, J. D. (2001). The globalization paradox: More markets, less democracy. Foreign Policy, 121, 38-53.
Bhagwati, J. (2004). In defense of globalization. Oxford University Press.
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
World Trade Organization. (2021). World Trade Report 2021: Making trade work for people. WTO Publications.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2020). Trade and Development Report 2020: From global pandemic to prosperity for all: Avoiding another lost decade. UNCTAD.
Baldwin, R. E. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.
Wood, A. (2018). North-South trade, employment, and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven world. Oxford University Press”.
Dutt, A. K. (2018). Globalization, inequality, and social democracy. Oxford University Press.
Chang, H. J. (2014). Economics: The user's guide. Pelican Books.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Oxfam. (2018). Reward work, not wealth: To end the inequality crisis, we must build an economy for ordinary working people, not the rich and powerful. Oxfam International.
Easterly, W. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists' adventures and misadventures in the tropics. MIT Press.
Prakash, A. (2017). Scaling up global value chains and local development. Cambridge University Press.
World Bank. (2019). Globalization: A brief overview. World Bank.